From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Faddis v. Carlton

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Dec 3, 1993
626 So. 2d 1122 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 93-2243.

December 3, 1993.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus, A Case of Original Jurisdiction.

Terry Lee Faddis, pro se.

Kaye Collie, Asst. County Atty., Orlando, for respondent.


Petitioner attempted to file a petition for writ of mandamus in the circuit court, but the clerk of the court returned the petition, indicating that it should be filed in the district court. Petitioner then filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court, seeking to compel the circuit court to accept and file the petition submitted. In response to the petition, the circuit court clerk stated that since it appears the circuit court has jurisdiction to review the petition for mandamus, the petition should not have been returned.

As stated in Collins v. Taylor, 579 So.2d 332 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), a circuit court clerk has a ministerial duty to accept and file petitions submitted, and does not have authority to judicially determine the legal significance of the document tendered. Since the circuit court clerk has conceded the error in this case, the petition for writ of mandamus is granted and the clerk directed to file the petition upon its resubmission.

PETITION GRANTED.

DIAMANTIS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Faddis v. Carlton

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Dec 3, 1993
626 So. 2d 1122 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Faddis v. Carlton

Case Details

Full title:TERRY LEE FADDIS, PETITIONER, v. HON. FRAN CARLTON, CIRCUIT COURT CLERK…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Dec 3, 1993

Citations

626 So. 2d 1122 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

Tanner v. State

Even when the lack of a correct file number affects the clerk's ability to "arrang[e the paper] in…

Grantley v. Clerk of the Circuit Court

Hence, here, once this court reinstated petitioner's right to file his own papers, respondent was endowed…