From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Factor v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Dec 13, 1930
294 P. 206 (Okla. Crim. App. 1930)

Opinion

No. A-7766.

Opinion Filed December 13, 1930.

(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error — Discretion of Court as to Withdrawal of Plea of Guilty. The granting or denying of permission to withdraw a plea of guilty, and to substitute a plea of not guilty, is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court, and its action must be upheld unless an abuse of such discretion clearly appears.

Appeal from District Court, Seminole County; W.J. Crump, Judge.

Timmie Factor was convicted of assault with a dangerous weapon, and he appeals. Affirmed.

Billingsley Stanley, for plaintiff in error.

J. Berry King, Atty. Gen., for the State.


The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Seminole county on a charge of assault with a dangerous weapon and was sentenced to serve a term of one year in the state penitentiary.

The information charges defendant with assault with intent to kill. At the close of the testimony defendant asked leave to withdraw his plea of not guilty and to enter a plea of guilty to the included offense of assault with a dangerous weapon. The court permitted this to be done. The plea was entered and the case passed for one week for the passing of sentence. At that time defendant filed a motion asking leave to withdraw his plea of guilty setting out that he is a full-blood Seminole Indian, did not know the English language, and did not understand that he would be sentenced to a term of one year in the penitentiary. He was represented at the trial by able counsel. Section 2621, Comp. St. 1921, permits the withdrawal of a plea of guilty at any time before judgment. This court has held that it may be withdrawn even after judgment, where it appears that a defendant was ignorant or unduly influenced, or his rights were not properly protected. Permitting a defendant to withdraw his plea is discretionary with the court. In this case there was no abuse of discretion.

The case is affirmed.

DAVENPORT and CHAPPELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Factor v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Dec 13, 1930
294 P. 206 (Okla. Crim. App. 1930)
Case details for

Factor v. State

Case Details

Full title:TIMMIE FACTOR v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Dec 13, 1930

Citations

294 P. 206 (Okla. Crim. App. 1930)
294 P. 206

Citing Cases

Voegel v. State

To bold that after a judgment had been pronounced, and where the court at the time did not suspend the same,…

Shaw v. State

This section does not appear altogether applicable, but by construction, this court has extended its meaning…