Opinion
2:21-cv-02252-RFB-BNW
04-29-2022
FACETEC, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. iPROOV LTD, a United Kingdom limited liability company, Defendant.
Evans Fears & Schuttert LLP, Jay J. Schuttert, Esq., David W. Gutke, Esq., Cooley LLP, Stephen Smith, Matthew J. Brigham Attorneys for Defendant Weide & Miller, Ltd., F. Christopher Austin, Esq., One LLP, Nathaniel L. Dilger, Peter R. Afrasiabi, William J. O'Brien Attorneys for Plaintiff.
Evans Fears & Schuttert LLP, Jay J. Schuttert, Esq., David W. Gutke, Esq., Cooley LLP, Stephen Smith, Matthew J. Brigham Attorneys for Defendant
Weide & Miller, Ltd., F. Christopher Austin, Esq., One LLP, Nathaniel L. Dilger, Peter R. Afrasiabi, William J. O'Brien Attorneys for Plaintiff.
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR 30-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S COUNTERCLAIM AND TO CONDUCT A RULE 26(F) CONFERENCE (FIRST REQUEST)
Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, 6-2, and LR 7-1, Plaintiff FaceTec, Inc., (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant iProov Ltd. (“Defendant”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to a 30-day extension of time for Plaintiff to respond to the counterclaim from May 4, 2022 to June 3, 2022, and to extend the deadline to conduct a Rule 26(f) conference accordingly.
The parties hereby stipulate to a 30-day extension of time for Plaintiff to respond to the counterclaim to allow Plaintiff a reasonable time to review Defendant's Answer to Complaint and Counterclaim, consult with counsel, and prepare a response. Accordingly, Plaintiff will have until June 3, 2022, to respond to Defendant's counterclaim.
The parties hereby stipulate to extend the deadline to conduct a Rule 26(f) conference to a date 30 days after Plaintiff files an answer to Defendant's counterclaim.
IT IS SO ORDERED: