Opinion
2:21-cv-02252-RFB-BNW
01-27-2022
FACETEC, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. iPROOV LTD, a United Kingdom limited liability company, Defendant.
Jay J. Schuttert, Esq. (SBN 8656) David W. Gutke, Esq. (SBN 9820) EVANS FEARS & SCHUTTERT LLP Attorneys for Defendant iProov Ltd. WEIDE & MILLER, LTD F. Christopher Austin, Esq. (SBN 6559) Nathanial L. Dilger, Esq. (CA Bar No. 196203) Peter R. Afrasiabi, Esq. (CA Bar No. 193336) ONE LLP William J. O'Brien, Esq. (CA Bar No. 99526) ONE LLP Attorneys for Defendant iProov Ltd
Jay J. Schuttert, Esq. (SBN 8656) David W. Gutke, Esq. (SBN 9820) EVANS FEARS & SCHUTTERT LLP Attorneys for Defendant iProov Ltd.
WEIDE & MILLER, LTD F. Christopher Austin, Esq. (SBN 6559) Nathanial L. Dilger, Esq. (CA Bar No. 196203) Peter R. Afrasiabi, Esq. (CA Bar No. 193336) ONE LLP William J. O'Brien, Esq. (CA Bar No. 99526) ONE LLP Attorneys for Defendant iProov Ltd
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT IPROOV LTD TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST)
BRENDA WEKSLER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff Facetec, Inc., and Defendant iProov Ltd, through their respective counsel, that the time for Defendant iProov Ltd to respond to the Complaint is extended by 45 days, from February 14, 2022 to March 31, 2022. This is the first such request by the parties. In conjunction with this extension, counsel for Defendant iProov Ltd agreed to accept service of the Summons and Complaint, effective January 24, 2022.
This extension request is necessary to provide additional time to evaluate the allegations in the Complaint. Accordingly, for good cause showing, the parties have agreed to an extension of time, up to and including March 31, 2022 for Defendant iProov to respond to the Complaint.
Dated January 26, 2022.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED