From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Faccini v. Cordish and Assoc

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 2002
300 A.D.2d 1141 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

CA 02-01110

December 30, 2002.

Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Niagara County (Fricano, J.), entered March 1, 2002, which granted the motion of defendants David Cordish and Associates and Rainbow Square, Ltd., also known as Rainball Mall, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them.

WEBSTER SZANYI LLP, BUFFALO (D. CHARLES ROBERTS, JR., OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

LAW OFFICES OF JOHN QUACKENBUSH, BUFFALO (ALAN J. BEDENKO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., PINE, WISNER, KEHOE, AND BURNS, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is denied and the complaint against defendants David Cordish and Associates and Rainbow Square, Ltd., also known as Rainbow Mall, is reinstated.

Same Memorandum as in Faccini v. David Cordish Assoc. ([appeal No. 1] 300 A.D.2d 1139 [Dec. 30, 2002]).


Summaries of

Faccini v. Cordish and Assoc

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 2002
300 A.D.2d 1141 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Faccini v. Cordish and Assoc

Case Details

Full title:CAROL M. FACCINI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DAVID CORDISH AND ASSOCIATES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 30, 2002

Citations

300 A.D.2d 1141 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
750 N.Y.S.2d 917