From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fabricant v. Backlinko

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 26, 2021
LA CV21-05900 JAK (ASx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2021)

Opinion

LA CV21-05900 JAK (ASx)

10-26-2021

Terry Fabricant v. Backlinko, et al.


CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

THE HONORABLE JOHN A. KRONSTADT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION RE BACKLINKO, LLC, et al.

The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than November 2, 2021, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. In the absence of showing good cause, an action shall be dismissed if the summons and complaint have not been served within 90 days after the filing of the complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). In light of the filing date of July 21, 2021, proof(s) of service were due by October 21, 2021. An action may also be dismissed prior to such time if the Plaintiff fails diligently to prosecute the action. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of an appropriate response. No oral argument will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Plaintiff is advised that the Court will consider the filing of a responsive pleading to the complaint and/or proof(s) of service, which indicates proper service in full compliance with the federal rules, on or before the date upon which the response is due, as a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Fabricant v. Backlinko

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 26, 2021
LA CV21-05900 JAK (ASx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2021)
Case details for

Fabricant v. Backlinko

Case Details

Full title:Terry Fabricant v. Backlinko, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Oct 26, 2021

Citations

LA CV21-05900 JAK (ASx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2021)