From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fabian v. United States

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nov 19, 1926
15 F.2d 696 (2d Cir. 1926)

Opinion

No. 85.

November 19, 1926.

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

Joseph Fabian was convicted of an offense, and he brings error. Affirmed.

M. Michael Edelstein, of New York City, for plaintiff in error.

Emory R. Buckner, U.S. Atty., of New York City (Robert B. Watts, Asst. U.S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for the United States.

Before HOUGH, MANTON, and HAND, Circuit Judges.


After careful examination of this record, we think the propositions of law concerning which plaintiff in error now complains were all set forth in the colloquial charge of the court, to which no exception was taken.

We repeat what was said in Gruher v. United States, 255 F. 474, 166 C.C.A. 550, as to our right to notice a plain error without exception, but we only do it to prevent injustice. This evidence shows conclusively that no injustice was done in finding the plaintiff in error guilty.

We likewise again point out that a trial judge is entirely justified in refusing to consider requests to charge first tendered after the close of his colloquial instructions to the jury. See La Fountain v. United States (C.C.A.) 14 F.2d 562.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Fabian v. United States

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nov 19, 1926
15 F.2d 696 (2d Cir. 1926)
Case details for

Fabian v. United States

Case Details

Full title:FABIAN v. UNITED STATES

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Nov 19, 1926

Citations

15 F.2d 696 (2d Cir. 1926)

Citing Cases

Weaver v. United States

The refusal to consider a request for such an instruction first tendered after the close of the charge is a…

United States v. Woods

Rachmil v. United States (C.C.A.) 288 F. 782. Some requests to charge not made within the time limited by the…