E.Z.E. Inc. v. Jackson

2 Citing cases

  1. Golson v. State

    270 So. 2d 36 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)   Cited 1 times

    But there are still definite limitations on the admissibility of such evidence under F.S. § 92.36, F.S.A., as first pointed out in Yates v. Helms, Fla.App. 1963, 154 So.2d 731. Subsequently our Supreme Court has had occasion to hold inadmissible under F.S. § 92.36, F.S.A., various "ledger book entries" and "shop-book evidence" where the mandatory requirements of F.S. § 92.36, F.S.A., were not affirmatively shown. E.Z.E. Inc. v. Jackson, Fla.App. 1970, 235 So.2d 337; Mastan Co. v. American Custom Homes, Inc., Fla.App. 1968, 214 So.2d 103; Dusine v. Golden Shores Convalescent Center, Inc., Fla.App. 1971, 249 So.2d 40. Under authority of the foregoing cases, most of which were from this 2nd District Court, the requisites for admission under F.S. § 92.36, F.S.A., of the records here in question were not met and therefore the admissibility of such records over objection was prejudicial error.

  2. Federated Dept. v. Antigo Indus

    297 So. 2d 591 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)   Cited 8 times

    Thus, we cannot say that this statement is devoid of any business regularity. Cf. E.Z.E., Inc. v. Jackson, Fla.App. 1970, 235 So.2d 337. Further, defendant-appellant does not quarrel with the sums reflected on this statement, but rather argues that it was entitled to certain set-off credits thereby impliedly admitting the correctness of the amounts on the account stated.