From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eyssallem v. Engel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 14, 2003
309 A.D.2d 594 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

1842

October 14, 2003.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth Thompson, J.), entered November 6, 2002, which denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

James Vincent McGovern, for plaintiff-respondent.

Edward J. O'Gorman, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Marlow, Gonzalez, JJ.


Although defendant maintains that the record establishes that the infant plaintiff's harm was not proximately caused by dim lighting or any failure by it to take precautions against water accumulations, summary judgment dismissing the complaint was properly denied in light of the existence of triable issues of fact.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Eyssallem v. Engel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 14, 2003
309 A.D.2d 594 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Eyssallem v. Engel

Case Details

Full title:AMBIORIS EYSSALLEM, ETC., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MARK ENGEL, ETC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 14, 2003

Citations

309 A.D.2d 594 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
765 N.Y.S.2d 42

Citing Cases

Bradley v. HWA 1290 III LLC

The conflict between Melendez's testimony that the lighting in the motor room was poor and Smith's testimony…