From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex'r of N.Y. Estate of Kates v. Pressly

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 14, 2015
132 A.D.3d 723 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

2015-10-14

EXECUTOR OF NEW YORK ESTATE OF CELIA KATES, Philip Barash, et al., appellants, v. James G. PRESSLY, etc., et al., respondents.

Philip Barash and Sandra Barash, Muttontown, N.Y., appellants pro se. L'Abbate, Balkan, Colavita & Contini, LLP, Garden City, N.Y. (Candice B. Ratner of counsel), for respondents.


Philip Barash and Sandra Barash, Muttontown, N.Y., appellants pro se. L'Abbate, Balkan, Colavita & Contini, LLP, Garden City, N.Y. (Candice B. Ratner of counsel), for respondents.

In an action to recover damages for a violation of Judiciary Law § 487, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Diamond, J.), dated June 7, 2013, as denied their second motion, in effect, for leave to reargue their prior motion for the entry of a default judgment against the defendants, which was denied in an order of the same court dated August 23, 2010.

Cross motion by the defendants, inter alia, to dismiss the appeal on the ground that no appeal lies from an order denying reargument. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated June 24, 2014, that branch of the cross motion which is to dismiss the appeal was held in abeyance and referred to the Justices hearing the appeal for determination upon the argument or submission thereof, and the cross motion was otherwise denied.

Upon the papers filed in support of the cross motion, the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the submission of the appeal, it is

ORDERED that the branch of the cross motion which is to dismiss the appeal is granted; and it is further,

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The appeal must be dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument ( see Emigrant Mtge. Co., Inc. v. Thevenin, 127 A.D.3d 919, 4 N.Y.S.3d 920; Basile v. Wiggs, 117 A.D.3d 766, 766, 984 N.Y.S.2d 882; Naso v. Naso, 102 A.D.3d 755, 756, 957 N.Y.S.2d 876; Rosenfeld v. Baker, 78 A.D.3d 810, 811, 913 N.Y.S.2d 233; Peralta v. All Weather Tire Sales & Serv., Inc., 58 A.D.3d 823, 823, 870 N.Y.S.2d 923). RIVERA, J.P., ROMAN, LaSALLE and BARROS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ex'r of N.Y. Estate of Kates v. Pressly

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 14, 2015
132 A.D.3d 723 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Ex'r of N.Y. Estate of Kates v. Pressly

Case Details

Full title:EXECUTOR OF NEW YORK ESTATE OF CELIA KATES, Philip Barash, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 14, 2015

Citations

132 A.D.3d 723 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 7469
17 N.Y.S.3d 662

Citing Cases

Einheber v. Sagalovich

The Supreme Court properly treated the plaintiff's motion as, in effect, one for leave to reargue his prior…