From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Expressway Associates v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp.

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Sep 18, 1990
580 A.2d 61 (Conn. 1990)

Opinion

Decided September 18, 1990


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 22 Conn. App. 124, is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Was the Appellate Court correct in including further proceedings with respect to damages in the remand when the plaintiff failed to prove damages at trial and conceded that it was entitled only to nominal damages?"

William H. Champlin III, in support of the petition.

Stephen Sakonchick Hand James T. Shearin, in opposition.


Summaries of

Expressway Associates v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp.

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Sep 18, 1990
580 A.2d 61 (Conn. 1990)
Case details for

Expressway Associates v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp.

Case Details

Full title:EXPRESSWAY ASSOCIATES II v. FRIENDLY ICE CREAM CORPORATION OF CONNECTICUT

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Sep 18, 1990

Citations

580 A.2d 61 (Conn. 1990)
216 Conn. 811

Citing Cases

Expressway Associates II v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp.

We granted certification limited to a single issue: "Was the Appellate Court correct in including further…

Expressway Associates II v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp.

Friendly filed a petition for certification to the Supreme Court, which was granted limited to the issue of…