From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Expose v. U.S. Bank

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 29, 2021
2:21-cv-1036 JAM AC (E.D. Cal. Jul. 29, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-1036 JAM AC

07-29-2021

LINDA ROSS EXPOSE, Plaintiff, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Defendant.


ORDER

THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Plaintiff proceeds in this action in pro per. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).

On June 17, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 3. On June 28, 2021, plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 4.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 17, 2021, are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is GRANTED but that the complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice because the court lacks jurisdiction and because it is duplicative of another case pending in this district.


Summaries of

Expose v. U.S. Bank

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 29, 2021
2:21-cv-1036 JAM AC (E.D. Cal. Jul. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Expose v. U.S. Bank

Case Details

Full title:LINDA ROSS EXPOSE, Plaintiff, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 29, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-1036 JAM AC (E.D. Cal. Jul. 29, 2021)