From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eximetals Corporation v. Guimaraes

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 21, 1980
414 N.E.2d 399 (N.Y. 1980)

Opinion

Argued September 3, 1980

Decided October 21, 1980

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, EDWARD J. GREENFIELD, J.

Franz S. Leichter and Stephen M. Harnik for appellants.

Laurence Shiff for Eximetals Corporation, plaintiff.

Mark Abramowitz and Aurora Cassirer for Bank Leumi Trust Company of New York, respondent.

Steven J. Stein, David Aronson and Marianne Stecich for Israel Discount Bank, respondent.


In each case: On the court's own motion, the September 16, 1980 decision to dismiss is vacated, the appellants having accepted this court's invitation to seek correction of the jurisdictional defect by obtaining leave to appeal from the Appellate Division on a certified question, and the following decision is substituted therefor: Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 73 A.D.2d 526) and the question certified answered in the affirmative.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.


Summaries of

Eximetals Corporation v. Guimaraes

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 21, 1980
414 N.E.2d 399 (N.Y. 1980)
Case details for

Eximetals Corporation v. Guimaraes

Case Details

Full title:EXIMETALS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. PINHEIRO GUIMARAES, S.A., et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 21, 1980

Citations

414 N.E.2d 399 (N.Y. 1980)
414 N.E.2d 399
433 N.Y.S.2d 1019

Citing Cases

Wood v. State Bank of Long Island

We disagree. New York requires strict compliance with the terms of a letter of credit (see, United…

United Commodities v. Bank

If the parties intended the page one documents to be applicable to the "Special Conditions" eventuality, they…