Opinion
Case No. 17-cv-04810-HSG
06-01-2020
EXELTIS USA INC., Plaintiff, v. FIRST DATABANK, INC., Defendant.
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO SEAL
Re: Dkt. Nos. 167, 179,
Pending before the Court are the parties' administrative motions to file under seal portions of documents in connection with motions for summary judgment and Daubert motions. The Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motions for the reasons described below.
I. LEGAL STANDARD
Courts generally apply a "compelling reasons" standard when considering motions to seal documents. Pintos v. Pac. Creditors Ass'n, 605 F.3d 665, 678 (9th Cir. 2010) (quoting Kamakana v. City & Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006)). "This standard derives from the common law right 'to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.'" Id. (quoting Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178). "[A] strong presumption in favor of access is the starting point." Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178 (quotations omitted). To overcome this strong presumption, the party seeking to seal a judicial record attached to a dispositive motion must "articulate compelling reasons supported by specific factual findings that outweigh the general history of access and the public policies favoring disclosure, such as the public interest in understanding the judicial process" and "significant public events." Id. at 1178-79 (quotations omitted). "In general, 'compelling reasons' sufficient to outweigh the public's interest in disclosure and justify sealing court records exist when such 'court files might have become a vehicle for improper purposes,' such as the use of records to gratify private spite, promote public scandal, circulate libelous statements, or release trade secrets." Id. at 1179 (quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 598 (1978)). "The mere fact that the production of records may lead to a litigant's embarrassment, incrimination, or exposure to further litigation will not, without more, compel the court to seal its records." Id.
Civil Local Rule 79-5 supplements the "compelling reasons" standard. The party seeking to file under seal must submit "a request that establishes that the document, or portions thereof, are privileged, protectable as a trade secret or otherwise entitled to protection under the law . . . . The request must be narrowly tailored to seek sealing only of sealable material . . . ." Civil L.R. 79-5(b). Courts have found that "confidential business information" in the form of "license agreements, financial terms, details of confidential licensing negotiations, and business strategies" satisfies the "compelling reasons" standard. See In re Qualcomm Litig., No. 3:17-cv-0108-GPC-MDD, 2017 WL 5176922, at *2 (S.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2017) (observing that sealing such information "prevent[ed] competitors from gaining insight into the parties' business model and strategy"); Finisar Corp. v. Nistica, Inc., No. 13-cv-03345-BLF (JSC), 2015 WL 3988132, at *5 (N.D. Cal. June 30, 2015).
Records attached to nondispositive motions must meet the lower "good cause" standard of Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as such records "are often unrelated, or only tangentially related, to the underlying cause of action." See Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1179-80 (quotations omitted). This requires a "particularized showing" that "specific prejudice or harm will result" if the information is disclosed. Phillips ex rel. Estates of Byrd v. Gen. Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c). "Broad allegations of harm, unsubstantiated by specific examples of articulated reasoning" will not suffice. Beckman Indus., Inc. v. Int'l Ins. Co., 966 F.2d 470, 476 (9th Cir. 1992) (quotation omitted).
II. DISCUSSION
Because the parties seek to seal portions and documents which pertain to summary judgment motions, the Court applies the compelling reasons standard to these documents. The Court applies the lower good cause standard for those documents related to the parties' Daubert motions.
As indicated in the table below, the only proffered justification for sealing many of the documents is that the information was designated as "confidential" or "confidential - attorneys' eyes only" by either Plaintiff or Defendant pursuant to the parties' protective order. But a designation of confidentiality is not sufficient to establish that a document is sealable. See Civ. L. R. 79-5(d)(1)(A). "Confidential" is merely the parties' initial designation of confidentiality to establish coverage under the stipulated protective order. See Verinata Health, Inc. v. Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc., No. 12-cv-05501-SI, 2015 WL 5117083, at *5 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2015) ("But good cause 'cannot be established simply by showing that the document is subject to a protective order or by stating in general terms that the material is considered to be confidential'") (quoting Bain v. AstraZeneca LP, No. 09-cv-4147, 2011 WL 482767, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2011)). Thus, many of the parties' motions do not comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5(d)(1)(A). In addition, in many instances the designating party for the materials did not comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5(e)(1), because they did not file a declaration within four days of the motion. See Civ. L.R. 79-5(e)(1). The Court finds that sealing is not warranted as to those documents. The parties also appear to have omitted some exhibits, either as public or under seal versions, so the Court could not make a determination about whether sealing is warranted in those circumstances.
Nevertheless, the Court finds that as to the remaining documents, the parties have narrowly tailored their requested redactions to confidential and proprietary business, sales, or licensing information, including the identities of the customers who subscribe to Defendant's database and Defendant's financial performance and company strategy. The public release of these documents could give non-party competitors an unfair advantage in the development or marketing of rival products. See In re Elec. Arts, Inc., 298 F. App'x 568, 569 (9th Cir. 2008) (ordering sealing where documents could be used "'as sources of business information that might harm a litigant's competitive standing'") (quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 598 (1978)). Thus, the Court finds that the parties have in those circumstances established either compelling reasons or good cause to grant the motions to file under seal. See, e.g., Linex Techs., Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Co., No. C 13-159 CW, 2014 WL 6901744 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2014); Apple Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co., Ltd., No. 11-CV-01846-LHK, 2012 WL 6115623 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2012).
| Docket No.Public /(Sealed) | Document | Portion(s) Sought to beSealed | Ruling |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 167 - GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART | |||
| Dkt. No. 168/(167-5) | Defendant's Motion forSummary Judgment | Excerpts | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 170/(167-9) | Motion to Exclude thePurported Expert Reportand Testimony of NormanSmith | Excerpts | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 169/(167-7) | Motion to Exclude thePurported Testimony ofKevin Gorospe | Excerpts | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 171-8/(167-12) | Exhibit H to theDeclaration of Ravi V.Sitwala in Support ofDefendant's Motions forSummary Judgment andto Strike ExpertTestimony | Entire Document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 171-9/(167-13) | Exhibit I to theDeclaration of Ravi V.Sitwala in Support ofDefendant's Motions forSummary Judgment andto Strike ExpertTestimony | Entire Document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 171-11/(167-14) | Exhibit K to theDeclaration of Ravi V.Sitwala in Support ofDefendant's Motions forSummary Judgment andto Strike ExpertTestimony | Entire Document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 171-12/(167-15) | Exhibit L to theDeclaration of Ravi V.Sitwala in Support ofDefendant's Motions forSummary Judgment andto Strike ExpertTestimony | Entire Document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 171-13/(167-16) | Exhibit M to theDeclaration of Ravi V.Sitwala in Support ofDefendant's Motions forSummary Judgment andto Strike ExpertTestimony | Entire Document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 171-14/(167-17) | Exhibit N to theDeclaration of Ravi V.Sitwala in Support ofDefendant's Motions forSummary Judgment andto Strike ExpertTestimony | Entire Document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 171-15/(167-18) | Exhibit O to theDeclaration of Ravi V.Sitwala in Support ofDefendant's Motions forSummary Judgment andto Strike ExpertTestimony | Entire Document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 171-16/(167-19) | Exhibit P to theDeclaration of Ravi V.Sitwala in Support ofDefendant's Motions forSummary Judgment andto Strike ExpertTestimony | Entire Document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 171-17/(167-20) | Exhibit Q to theDeclaration of Ravi V.Sitwala in Support ofDefendant's Motions forSummary Judgment andto Strike ExpertTestimony | Entire Document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 171-18/(167-21) | Exhibit R to theDeclaration of Ravi V.Sitwala in Support ofDefendant's Motions forSummary Judgment andto Strike ExpertTestimony | Entire Document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 171-19/(167-22) | Exhibit S to theDeclaration of Ravi V.Sitwala in Support ofDefendant's Motions forSummary Judgment andto Strike Expert | Entire Document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Testimony | |||
| Dkt. No. 171-20/(167-23) | Exhibit T to theDeclaration of Ravi V.Sitwala in Support ofDefendant's Motions forSummary Judgment andto Strike ExpertTestimony | Entire Document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 171-21/(167-24) | Exhibit U to theDeclaration of Ravi V.Sitwala in Support ofDefendant's Motions forSummary Judgment andto Strike ExpertTestimony | Entire Document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 171-22/(167-25) | Exhibit V to theDeclaration of Ravi V.Sitwala in Support ofDefendant's Motions forSummary Judgment andto Strike ExpertTestimony | Entire Document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 171-23/(167-26) | Exhibit W to theDeclaration of Ravi V.Sitwala in Support ofDefendant's Motions forSummary Judgment andto Strike ExpertTestimony | Entire Document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 171-26/(167-27) | Exhibit Z to theDeclaration of Ravi V.Sitwala in Support ofDefendant's Motions forSummary Judgment andto Strike ExpertTestimony | Entire Document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 171-29/(167-28) | Exhibit CC to theDeclaration of Ravi V.Sitwala in Support ofDefendant's Motions forSummary Judgment andto Strike ExpertTestimony | Entire Document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 171-39/(167-29) | Exhibit MM to theDeclaration of Ravi V.Sitwala in Support ofDefendant's Motions forSummary Judgment and | Entire Document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| to Strike ExpertTestimony | |||
| Dkt. No. 171-41/(167-29) | Exhibit OO to theDeclaration of Ravi V.Sitwala in Support ofDefendant's Motions forSummary Judgment andto Strike ExpertTestimony | Entire Document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dkt. No. 171-43/(167-30) | Exhibit QQ to theDeclaration of Ravi V.Sitwala in Support ofDefendant's Motions forSummary Judgment andto Strike ExpertTestimony | Excerpts | GRANTED(Contains proprietarybusiness informationabout Defendant'ssubscribers. See Dkt.No. 167-2.) |
| Dkt. No. 171-44/(167-31) | Exhibit RR to theDeclaration of Ravi V.Sitwala in Support ofDefendant's Motions forSummary Judgment andto Strike ExpertTestimony | Entire Document | GRANTED INPART and DENIEDIN PART(Pages 14 and 15contain proprietarybusiness informationabout Defendant'ssubscribers.However, nosupportingdeclaration filed as tothe rest of thedocument. See Civ.L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Dkt. No. 179 - GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART | |||
| Dkt. No. 180/(179-2) | Page 4:13-17Page 5:2-21Page 6:3-6, 12-25Page 7:1-12, 17-28Page 8:1-6Page 12:11-13Page 15:5-17, 20-23Page 16:1-8, 1-28Page 17:1, 4-7, 11-16Page 20:2Page 22:3-28Page 23:1-9Page 24:1-4, 14-28Page 25:1-7Page 26:1-26Page 27:1-4Page 30:15-17 | GRANTED(Contains proprietarybusiness informationabout Defendant'ssubscribers. See Dkt.Nos. 184, 185.) |
| Page 33:8-9, 28Page 34:1-23 | |||
| (179-3) | Exhibit 2 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | GRANTED INPART and DENIEDIN PART(Granted only as tothe text that containsproprietary businessinformationidentifyingDefendant'scustomers. See Dkt.Nos. 184, 185.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| (179-4) | Exhibit 3 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | GRANTED INPART and DENIEDIN PART(Granted only as tothe text that containsproprietary businessinformationidentifyingDefendant'scustomers. See Dkt.Nos. 184, 185.) |
| (179-5) | Exhibit 8 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | GRANTED(Contains proprietarybusiness informationabout Plaintiff'scontracts with thirdparties. See Dkt. No.179-1.) |
| (179-6) | Exhibit 9 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | GRANTED(Contains proprietarybusiness informationabout Plaintiff'scontracts with thirdparties. See Dkt. No.179-1.) |
| (179-7) | Exhibit 10 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | GRANTED(Contains proprietarybusiness informationabout Plaintiff'scontracts with thirdparties. See Dkt. No.179-1.) |
| (179-8) | Exhibit 11 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support of | Entire Document | GRANTED(Contains proprietarybusiness information |
| Plaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | about Plaintiff'scontracts with thirdparties. See Dkt. No.179-1.) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Exhibit 12 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | DENIED(No public or sealedversion of thedocument for review.) |
| (179-9) | Exhibit 13 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | GRANTED(Contains proprietarybusiness informationabout Plaintiff'scontracts with thirdparties. See Dkt. No.179-1.) |
| (179-10) | Exhibit 16 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | GRANTED INPART and DENIEDIN PART(Granted only as tothe text that containsproprietary businessinformationidentifyingDefendant'scustomers. See Dkt.Nos. 184, 185.) |
| (179-11) | Exhibit 17 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | GRANTED(Contains proprietarybusiness informationabout Defendant'ssubscribers. See Dkt.Nos. 184, 191.) |
| (179-12) | Exhibit 18 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | GRANTED(Contains proprietarybusiness informationabout Defendant'sfinancial performanceand companystrategy. See Dkt.No. 184.) |
| (179-13) | Exhibit 19 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| (179-14) | Exhibit 20 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | GRANTED INPART and DENIEDIN PART(Granted only as tothe text that containsproprietary businessinformationidentifyingDefendant'scustomers. See Dkt.Nos. 184, 185.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| (179-15) | Exhibit 21 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | GRANTED INPART and DENIEDIN PART(Granted only as tothe text that containsproprietary businessinformationidentifyingDefendant'scustomers andregarding customercontracts. See Dkt.Nos. 184, 185.) |
| (179-16) | Exhibit 22 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | GRANTED INPART and DENIEDIN PART(Granted only as tothe text that containsproprietary businessinformationidentifyingDefendant'scustomers. See Dkt.Nos. 184, 185.) |
| (179-17) | Exhibit 23 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| (179-18) | Exhibit 24 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| (179-19) | Exhibit 25 to the | Entire Document | GRANTED IN |
| Declaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | PART and DENIEDIN PART(Granted only as tothe text that containsproprietary businessinformationidentifyingDefendant'scustomers. See Dkt.Nos. 184, 185.) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| (179-20) | Exhibit 28 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| (179-21) | Exhibit 29 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | GRANTED INPART and DENIEDIN PART(Granted only as tothe text that containsproprietary businessinformationidentifyingDefendant'scustomers. See Dkt.Nos. 184, 185.) |
| (179-22) | Exhibit 30 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| (179-23) | Exhibit 32 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| (179-24) | Exhibit 33 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | GRANTED(Contains proprietarybusiness informationrelating to theoperations ofDefendant. See Dkt.Nos. 90, 184, 185.) |
| (179-25) | Exhibit 34 to theDeclaration of Benjamin | Entire Document | DENIED(No supporting |
| M. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | declaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| (179-26) | Exhibit 35 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | GRANTED INPART and DENIEDIN PART(Granted only as tothe text that containsproprietary businessinformationidentifyingDefendant'scustomers. See Dkt.Nos. 184, 185.) |
| N/A | Exhibit 36 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | DENIED(No public or sealedversion of thedocument for review.) |
| (179-27) | Exhibit 37 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | GRANTED INPART and DENIEDIN PART(Granted only as tothe text that containsproprietary businessinformationidentifyingDefendant'scustomers. See Dkt.Nos. 184, 185.) |
| (179-28) | Exhibit 39 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| (179-29) | Exhibit 40 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | GRANTED INPART and DENIEDIN PART(Granted only as tothe text that containsproprietary businessinformationidentifyingDefendant'scustomers. See Dkt. |
| Nos. 184, 185.) | |||
| (179-30) | Exhibit 41 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | GRANTED INPART and DENIEDIN PART(Granted only as tothe text that containsproprietary businessinformationidentifyingDefendant'scustomers. See Dkt.Nos. 184, 185.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| (179-31) | Exhibit 42 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| (179-32) | Exhibit 48 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| (179-33) | Exhibit 49 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| (179-34) | Exhibit 51 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | GRANTED INPART and DENIEDIN PART(Granted only as tothe text that containsproprietary businessinformationidentifyingDefendant'scustomers. See Dkt.Nos. 184, 185.) |
| (179-35) | Exhibit 52 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| (179-36) | Exhibit 53 to the | Entire Document | GRANTED IN |
| Declaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | PART and DENIEDIN PART(Granted only as tothe text that containsproprietary businessinformationidentifyingDefendant'scustomers. See Dkt.Nos. 184, 185.) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| (179-37) | Exhibit 54 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | GRANTED INPART and DENIEDIN PART(Granted only as tothe text that containsproprietary businessinformationidentifyingDefendant'scustomers. See Dkt.Nos. 184, 185.) |
| (179-38) | Exhibit 55 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | GRANTED INPART and DENIEDIN PART(Granted only as tothe text that containsproprietary businessinformationidentifyingDefendant'scustomers. See Dkt.Nos. 184, 185.) |
| (179-39) | Exhibit 56 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | GRANTED INPART and DENIEDIN PART(Granted only as tothe text that containsproprietary businessinformationidentifyingDefendant'scustomers. See Dkt.Nos. 184, 185.) |
| (179-40) | Exhibit 57 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for Summary | Entire Document | GRANTED INPART and DENIEDIN PART(Granted only as tothe text that contains |
| Judgment | proprietary businessinformationidentifyingDefendant'scustomers. See Dkt.Nos. 184, 185.) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| (179-41) | Exhibit 58 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | GRANTED INPART and DENIEDIN PART(Granted only as tothe text that containsproprietary businessinformationidentifyingDefendant'scustomers. See Dkt.Nos. 184, 185.) |
| (179-42) | Exhibit 59 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | GRANTED INPART and DENIEDIN PART(Granted only as tothe text that containsproprietary businessinformationidentifyingDefendant'scustomers. See Dkt.Nos. 184, 185.) |
| (179-43) | Exhibit 60 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | GRANTED(Contains proprietarybusiness informationand survey responseswith demographicinformation. See Dkt.No. 179-1.) |
| (179-44) | Exhibit 61 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| (179-45) | Exhibit 63 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | GRANTED INPART and DENIEDIN PART(Granted only as tothe text that containsproprietary businessinformation |
| identifyingDefendant'scustomers. See Dkt.Nos. 184, 185.) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| (179-46) | Exhibit 64 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| (179-47) | Exhibit 65 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| (179-48) | Exhibit 66 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| (179-49) | Exhibit 67 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | GRANTED INPART and DENIEDIN PART(Granted only as tothe text that containsproprietary businessinformationidentifyingDefendant'scustomers. See Dkt.Nos. 184, 185.) |
| (179-50) | Exhibit 68 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| (179-51) | Exhibit 69 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | GRANTED INPART and DENIEDIN PART(Granted only as tothe text that containsproprietary businessinformationidentifyingDefendant's |
| customers. See Dkt.Nos. 184, 185.) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| (179-52) | Exhibit 72 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | GRANTED(Contains proprietarybusiness informationabout Defendant'scontracts with third-party customers. SeeDkt. Nos. 184, 185.) |
| (179-53) | Exhibit 73 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | GRANTED(Contains proprietarybusiness informationabout Defendant'scontracts with third-party customers. SeeDkt. Nos. 184, 185.) |
| (179-54) | Exhibit 74 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | GRANTED(Contains proprietarybusiness informationabout Defendant'scontracts with third-party customers. SeeDkt. Nos. 184, 185.) |
| (179-55) | Exhibit 75 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | GRANTED(Contains proprietarybusiness informationabout Defendant'scontracts with third-party customers. SeeDkt. Nos. 184, 185.) |
| (179-56) | Exhibit 78 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| (179-57) | Exhibit 79 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | GRANTED INPART and DENIEDIN PART(Granted only as tothe text that containsproprietary businessinformationidentifyingDefendant'scustomers. See Dkt.Nos. 184, 185.) |
| (179-58) | Exhibit 80 to the | Entire Document | GRANTED IN |
| Declaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | PART and DENIEDIN PART(Granted only as tothe text that containsproprietary businessinformationidentifyingDefendant'scustomers. See Dkt.Nos. 184, 185.) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| (179-59) | Exhibit 81 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | GRANTED INPART and DENIEDIN PART(Granted only as tothe text that containsproprietary businessinformationidentifyingDefendant'scustomers. See Dkt.Nos. 184, 185.) |
| (179-60) | Exhibit 82 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | GRANTED INPART and DENIEDIN PART(Granted only as tothe text that containsproprietary businessinformationidentifyingDefendant'scustomers. See Dkt.Nos. 184, 185.) |
| (179-61) | Exhibit 83 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | GRANTED INPART and DENIEDIN PART(Granted only as tothe text that containsproprietary businessinformationidentifyingDefendant'scustomers. See Dkt.Nos. 184, 185.) |
| (179-62) | Exhibit 84 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for Summary | Entire Document | DENIED(No supportingdeclaration filed. SeeCiv. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).) |
| Judgment | |||
| (179-63) | Exhibit 85 to theDeclaration of BenjaminM. Mundel in Support ofPlaintiff's Opposition tothe Motion for SummaryJudgment | Entire Document | GRANTED INPART and DENIEDIN PART(Granted only as tothe text that containsproprietary businessinformationidentifyingDefendant'scustomers. See Dkt.Nos. 184, 185.) |
|---|
III. CONCLUSION
The Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the parties' administrative motions to file under seal. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(f)(1), documents filed under seal as to which the administrative motions are granted will remain under seal. The Court DIRECTS the parties to file public versions of all documents for which the proposed sealing has been denied, as indicated in the chart above, within seven days from the date of this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 6/1/2020
/s/_________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge