From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Executive Benefits Ins. Agency v. Arkison (In re Bellingham Ins. Agency, Inc.)

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Nov 4, 2011
661 F.3d 476 (9th Cir. 2011)

Summary

requesting supplemental briefs addressing whether Stern “prohibit bankruptcy courts from entering a final, binding judgment on an action to avoid a fraudulent conveyance”

Summary of this case from Messer v. Bentley Manhattan Inc. (In re Madison Bentley Associates, LLC)

Opinion

No. 11–35162.

2011-11-4

In the Matter of BELLINGHAM INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., Debtor.Executive Benefits Insurance Agency, Appellant, v. Peter H. Arkison, Trustee, solely in his capacity as Chapter 7 Trustee of the estate of Bellingham Insurance Agency, Inc., Appellee.

Nicholas Arthur Paleveda, Esquire, Law Offices of Nicholas Paleveda MBA J.D. LL.M, Bellingham, WA, for Appellant. Denice Moewes, Wood & Jones, Seattle, WA, for Appellee.


Nicholas Arthur Paleveda, Esquire, Law Offices of Nicholas Paleveda MBA J.D. LL.M, Bellingham, WA, for Appellant. Denice Moewes, Wood & Jones, Seattle, WA, for Appellee. D.C. No. 2:10–cv–00929–MJP, Western District of Washington, Seattle.Before: ALEX KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, RICHARD A. PAEZ, Circuit Judge, and RANER C. COLLINS, District Judge.

The Honorable Raner C. Collins, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation.

ORDER

The court invites supplemental briefs by any amicus curiae addressing the following questions: Does Stern v. Marshall, ––– U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct. 2594, 180 L.Ed.2d 475 (2011), prohibit bankruptcy courts from entering a final, binding judgment on an action to avoid a fraudulent conveyance? If so, may the bankruptcy court hear the proceeding and submit a report and recommendation to a federal district court in lieu of entering a final judgment?

Any briefs responding to this order shall be filed no later than thirty days from the filed date of this order. All briefs shall 477 comply with the page or type-volume limitations specified in Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 29(d) and 32(a)(7). Any person or entity wishing to file a brief as an amicus curiae in response to this order is granted leave to do so pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 29(a).


Summaries of

Executive Benefits Ins. Agency v. Arkison (In re Bellingham Ins. Agency, Inc.)

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Nov 4, 2011
661 F.3d 476 (9th Cir. 2011)

requesting supplemental briefs addressing whether Stern “prohibit bankruptcy courts from entering a final, binding judgment on an action to avoid a fraudulent conveyance”

Summary of this case from Messer v. Bentley Manhattan Inc. (In re Madison Bentley Associates, LLC)

requesting supplemental briefs addressing whether Stern "prohibit bankruptcy courts from entering a final, binding judgment on an action to avoid a fraudulent conveyance"

Summary of this case from Messer v. Bentley Manhattan Inc. (In re Madison Bentley Assocs., LLC)

inviting supplemental briefs by amicus curiae addressing the following questions: Does Stern v. Marshall, ––– U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct. 2594, 180 L.Ed.2d 475, prohibit bankruptcy courts from entering a final, binding judgment on an action to avoid a fraudulent conveyance? If so, may the bankruptcy court hear the proceeding and submit a report and recommendation to a federal district court in lieu of entering a final judgment?

Summary of this case from Heller Ehrman LLP v. Arnold & Porter, LLP (In re Heller Ehrman LLP)

inviting amicus curiae briefs on question “Does Stern v. Marshall, ––– U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct. 2594, 180 L.Ed.2d 475, prohibit bankruptcy courts from entering a final, binding judgment on an action to avoid a fraudulent conveyance?”

Summary of this case from Goldstein v. Eby-Brown, Inc. (In re Universal Mktg., Inc.)
Case details for

Executive Benefits Ins. Agency v. Arkison (In re Bellingham Ins. Agency, Inc.)

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BELLINGHAM INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., Debtor.Executive…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Date published: Nov 4, 2011

Citations

661 F.3d 476 (9th Cir. 2011)

Citing Cases

Neilson v. Monterey Cnty. Bank (In re Cedar Funding, Inc.)

If so, may the bankruptcy court hear the proceeding and submit a report and recommendation to a federal…

Messer v. Bentley Manhattan Inc. (In re Madison Bentley Associates, LLC)

But most courts in this district have held that because a fraudulent conveyance claim is “precisely the kind…