From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Excel Radiology Serv. v. Utica Mut. Ins.

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 28, 2011
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 50751 (N.Y. App. Term 2011)

Opinion

571044/10.

Decided April 28, 2011.

Defendant appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Raul Cruz, J.), entered June 7, 2010, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Order (Raul Cruz, J.), entered June 7, 2010, affirmed, with $10 costs.

PRESENT: Hunter, Jr., J.P., Schoenfeld, Torres, JJ.


In this action to recover first-party no-fault medical benefits, defendant's motion for summary judgment was properly denied since it failed to establish, prima facie, that the notices of the independent medical examinations (IMEs) were properly mailed to the assignor and that he failed to appear for the IMEs ( see Stephen Fogel Psychological, P.C. v Progressive Cas. Ins. Co. , 35 AD3d 720 , 721; Marina v Praetorian Ins. Co. , 28 Misc 3d 132[A], 2010 NY Slip Op 51292[U]; cf. Inwood Hill Med., P.C. v General Assur. Co. , 10 Misc 3d 18 , 19-20). Given defendant's failure to meet its burden, denial of its motion was required regardless of the sufficiency of plaintiff's opposition papers ( see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324; Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


Summaries of

Excel Radiology Serv. v. Utica Mut. Ins.

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 28, 2011
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 50751 (N.Y. App. Term 2011)
Case details for

Excel Radiology Serv. v. Utica Mut. Ins.

Case Details

Full title:EXCEL RADIOLOGY SERVICE, P.C. a/a/o Wilmer Centeno, Plaintiff-Respondent…

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 28, 2011

Citations

2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 50751 (N.Y. App. Term 2011)