From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Excel Imaging, P.C. v. Mvaic

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 4, 2010
27 Misc. 3d 141 (N.Y. App. Term 2010)

Summary

In Excel, this court, in effect, took the position that either one of the aforementioned grounds, standing alone, would constitute a fatal defect rendering the denial of claim a nullity.

Summary of this case from Mollo Chiropractic, PLLC v. American Commerce Insurance

Opinion

No. 2009-1140 K C.

June 4, 2010.


Insurance — Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation — First-Party No-Fault Benefits.


Summaries of

Excel Imaging, P.C. v. Mvaic

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 4, 2010
27 Misc. 3d 141 (N.Y. App. Term 2010)

In Excel, this court, in effect, took the position that either one of the aforementioned grounds, standing alone, would constitute a fatal defect rendering the denial of claim a nullity.

Summary of this case from Mollo Chiropractic, PLLC v. American Commerce Insurance
Case details for

Excel Imaging, P.C. v. Mvaic

Case Details

Full title:Excel Imaging, P.C. v. MVAIC

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 4, 2010

Citations

27 Misc. 3d 141 (N.Y. App. Term 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 50998

Citing Cases

Mollo Chiropractic, PLLC v. American Commerce Insurance

The Civil Court therefore found, in effect, that defendant's defense of lack of medical necessity was…

T & M Rehab PT, P.C. v. Unitrin Auto & Home Ins. Co.

The parties shall proceed to trial on this issue only.” Thereafter, by order entered January 3, 2011, the…