From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Exact Invs. v. Vesnaver

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Sep 21, 2021
2:17-cv-6109 (DRH) (ARL) (E.D.N.Y. Sep. 21, 2021)

Opinion

2:17-cv-6109 (DRH) (ARL)

09-21-2021

EXACT INVESTMENTS LLC, Plaintiff, v. PAUL VESNAVER both, individual and as an ATTORNEY/PRINCIPAL in the LAW FIRM OF PAUL VESNAVER P.C., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

DENIS R. HURLEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presently before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay, dated July 12, 2021 (the “R&R” [DE 24]), recommending the Court deny without prejudice Plaintiff's motion for default judgment. Judge Lindsay concluded that “Plaintiff failed to provide a memorandum of law or any support for its claim of damages or attorney's fees.” R&R at 2.

More than fourteen (14) days have passed since service of the R&R and no objections have been filed. See [DE 25]. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule Civil Procedure 72, this Court has reviewed the R&R for clear error. Having found none, the Court concurs in the R&R's reasoning and result. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, the Plaintiff's motion for default judgment is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to refiling with the appropriate documentation. Plaintiff shall refile their motion papers on or before October 6, 2021.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Exact Invs. v. Vesnaver

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Sep 21, 2021
2:17-cv-6109 (DRH) (ARL) (E.D.N.Y. Sep. 21, 2021)
Case details for

Exact Invs. v. Vesnaver

Case Details

Full title:EXACT INVESTMENTS LLC, Plaintiff, v. PAUL VESNAVER both, individual and as…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Sep 21, 2021

Citations

2:17-cv-6109 (DRH) (ARL) (E.D.N.Y. Sep. 21, 2021)

Citing Cases

Dominguez v. Hernandez

Failing to serve and file one or more of the required documents supports denying a motion for a default. See…