From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex parte West

Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
Jul 14, 2016
No. 07-16-00228-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 14, 2016)

Opinion

No. 07-16-00228-CR

07-14-2016

EX PARTE DAVID FRANKLIN WEST


From the 69th District Court Dallam County, Texas
Trial Court No. 4471; Honorable Ron Enns, Presiding

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

David Franklin West has two appeals pending in this court: a conviction for possession of more than 400 grams of tetrahydrocannabinol for which he received a sentence of thirty years, and a conviction for possession of more than one gram but less than four of methamphetamine for which he received a sentence of ten years. Both substances fall within Penalty Group 2 and both are felonies.

Appellate cause number 07-16-00137-CR.

Appellate cause number 07-16-00138-CR.

TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. §§ 481.103(a)(1), 481.116(c), (e) (West Supp. 2015). --------

On June 13, 2016, West filed a Petition for Writ of Supersedeas to Obtain a Stay By Supersedeas Bond on Appeal Pursuant to Fed . R. Civ. P. 62(d). Essentially, he argues that he is "being held unlawfully" because no crime can be shown to have been committed. We construe his filing as presenting an application for a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus and dismiss this proceeding for want of jurisdiction.

It is well established that only the Court of Criminal Appeals possesses the authority to grant relief in a post-conviction habeas corpus proceeding where there is a final felony conviction. Padieu v. Court of Appeals of Tex., Fifth Dist., 392 S.W.3d 115, 117 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam). Intermediate appellate courts play no role in post-conviction writs of habeas corpus. Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App.); In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 718 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding).

Furthermore, even if we were to construe West's pleading as seeking an appeal bond, he is not eligible. Article 44.04(b) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure provides that a defendant may not be released on bail pending the appeal from any felony conviction where the punishment equals or exceeds ten years confinement. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.04(b) (West Supp. 2015). West's sentences exclude him from pursuing an appeal bond.

Accordingly, West's purported application for a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Per Curiam Do not publish.


Summaries of

Ex parte West

Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
Jul 14, 2016
No. 07-16-00228-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 14, 2016)
Case details for

Ex parte West

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE DAVID FRANKLIN WEST

Court:Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

Date published: Jul 14, 2016

Citations

No. 07-16-00228-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 14, 2016)