From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte T.S

Supreme Court of Alabama
Feb 6, 1998
710 So. 2d 406 (Ala. 1998)

Opinion

1970007.

February 6, 1998.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals (Launderdale Circuit Court, CS-96-163; Court of Civil Appeals, 2960637); Larry Mack Smith, Judge.

Lindsey Mussleman Davis of Holt, McKenzie, Holt Mussleman, Florence, for petitioner.

No brief filed for respondents.


WRIT DENIED.

HOOPER, C.J., and ALMON, SHORES, HOUSTON, KENNEDY, BUTTS, and SEE, JJ., concur.

MADDOX, J., concurs specially.


I agree that the petition for certiorari should be denied, because it does not comply with Rule 39, Ala. R. App. P. See Ex parte Save Our Streams, Inc., 541 So.2d 549 (Ala. 1989). The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment, without an opinion, under the provisions of Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(E), Ala. R. App. P. See T.S. v. G.S.A. (No. 2960637) ___ So.2d ___ (Ala.Civ.App. 1997) (table). I would point out that in its no-opinion memorandum affirmance the Court of Civil Appeals cited, in support of the affirmance, Ex parte Presse, 554 So.2d 406 (Ala. 1989), a case that involved an important federal constitutional question of family law. I dissented vigorously in Presse, and I still think the decision in that case was very wrong; nevertheless, the petition now before us does not present the federal constitutional question sufficiently as required by Rule 39, Ala. R.App. P.; see, especially Rule 39(c) and (k).


Summaries of

Ex Parte T.S

Supreme Court of Alabama
Feb 6, 1998
710 So. 2d 406 (Ala. 1998)
Case details for

Ex Parte T.S

Case Details

Full title:Ex parte T.S. (Re T.S. v. G.S.A., et al.)

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Feb 6, 1998

Citations

710 So. 2d 406 (Ala. 1998)