From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Taylor

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Mar 23, 2005
No. WR-48,498-02 (Tex. Crim. App. Mar. 23, 2005)

Opinion

No. WR-48,498-02

March 23, 2005. DO NOT PUBLISH.

On Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus from Cause No. 0542281AR in the 297th District Court of Tarrant County.


ORDER


This is a subsequent application for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.071, Section 5, of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. On June 23, 1994, Applicant was convicted of the offense of capital murder. The jury answered the special issues submitted under Article 37.071, of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure in the affirmative, and the trial court, accordingly, set punishment at death. Applicant's conviction was affirmed on direct appeal. Taylor v. State, 920 S.W.2d 319 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996). Applicant presents three allegations in his application. His first claim, that his death sentence would violate the United States Supreme Court's opinion in Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), holding that the Eighth Amendment prohibits the execution of the mentally retarded, satisfies the requirements of Article 11.071, Section 5, and was remanded to the trial court for consideration of that issue. His second and third claims were dismissed because they did not satisfy the requirements of Article 11.071, Section 5. On remand, the trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law recommending that this application be denied because Applicant has failed to show by a preponderance of the evidence that he is mentally retarded. However, the trial court did not hold a live hearing to consider testimony regarding this issue. In this case, we find a live hearing is necessary. Thus, this cause is remanded to the trial court for a live hearing so that the parties may present evidence regarding the issue of whether Applicant is mentally retarded. Because this Court does not hear evidence, Ex Parte Rodriquez, 334 S.W.2d 294 (Tex.Crim.App. 1960), this application will be held in abeyance pending the trial court's compliance with this order. The trial court shall resolve the issue presented within 120 days of the date of this order. A supplemental transcript containing the transcription of the court reporter's notes from the hearing, along with the trial court's findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 180 days of the date of this order. IT IS SO ORDERED.

In the event any continuances are granted, copies of the order granting the continuance should be provided to this Court.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Taylor

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Mar 23, 2005
No. WR-48,498-02 (Tex. Crim. App. Mar. 23, 2005)
Case details for

Ex Parte Taylor

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE ELKIE LEE TAYLOR

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Mar 23, 2005

Citations

No. WR-48,498-02 (Tex. Crim. App. Mar. 23, 2005)