From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Taylor

Supreme Court of Alabama
May 15, 1924
100 So. 331 (Ala. 1924)

Opinion

7 Div. 481.

May 15, 1924.

Hugh Walker, of Anniston, for petitioner.

In view of the decision, it is not necessary that brief be here set out.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., opposed.

No brief reached the Reporter.


In this case the record shows that defendant's application for rehearing was overruled by the Court of Appeals on April 8, 1924, and that his petition for the writ of certiorari to review the judgment of that court was filed in this court on April 24, 1924. Not being filed within fifteen days, as the law requires, the petition comes too late, and must for that reason be dismissed.

Petition dismissed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and THOMAS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Taylor

Supreme Court of Alabama
May 15, 1924
100 So. 331 (Ala. 1924)
Case details for

Ex Parte Taylor

Case Details

Full title:Ex parte TAYLOR

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: May 15, 1924

Citations

100 So. 331 (Ala. 1924)
211 Ala. 282

Citing Cases

Trammell v. State

The application was not filed within that time. Where the petition for certiorari is not filed in this court…

Mabry v. State

The petition for writ of certiorari was not "filed with the clerk of this court within fifteen days after the…