Opinion
No. AP-75,639
Delivered: March 21, 2007. DO NOT PUBLISH.
On Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, In Cause No. 836855-B, In the 183rd District Court Harris County.
OPINION
This is an application for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to the provisions of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 11.071. In September 2000, a jury convicted applicant of the offense of capital murder. The jury answered the special issues submitted pursuant to Code of Criminal Procedure article 37.071, and the trial court, accordingly, set punishment at death. This Court affirmed the judgment and sentence. Stevenson v. State, 73 S.W.3d 914 (Tex.Crim.App. 2002). Applicant presented two allegations in his application. In his first claim, applicant asserted that, because he is mentally retarded, his execution would violate the United States Supreme Court's opinion in Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), holding that the Eighth Amendment prohibits the execution of the mentally retarded. In his second claim, applicant asserted that his mental retardation and mental illness rendered his execution unconstitutional. By written order dated November 5, 2003, this Court dismissed applicant's second claim and remanded his first claim to the trial court for consideration. On remand, after conducting their respective investigations, applicant and the State agreed that applicant is mentally retarded. The trial court found the State's expert to be credible and adopted the joint findings of fact and conclusions of law proposed by the parties. The trial court concluded that applicant had met his burden on habeas and relief should be granted. This Court has reviewed the record. We adopt the trial judge's findings and conclusions, except finding number 35, which we reject. See Ex parte Lewis, S.W.3d, No. WP-38,355-03 (Tex.Crim.App. Dec. 6, 2006) (per curiam order and concurring statement by Cochran, J.). Relief is granted. Applicant's sentence is reformed from death to life imprisonment.