From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Sproull

Supreme Court of Texas
Sep 1, 1991
815 S.W.2d 250 (Tex. 1991)

Summary

holding in a habeas proceeding that an alleged contemnor, sentenced to twenty-two years' confinement for failure to pay child support, had a constitutional right to a jury trial as he faced a serious charge of criminal contempt; defining a serious charge of criminal contempt as a charge for which the confinement may exceed six months

Summary of this case from Clark v. Bres

Opinion

No. D-0954.

September 1, 1991.

Appeal from the 221st District Court, Montgomery County

Frederick E. Edwards, The Woodlands, for relator.

Nelda L. Luce, Jim Blair, The Woodlands, for respondent.


The trial court found relator in contempt for failure to pay child support and sentenced him to over 22 years' confinement — 8,160 days, to be exact, 60 days for each of 136 missed payments to be served consecutively. The trial court suspended commitment and placed relator on 30 days' probation conditioned on his payment of over $40,000 within 23 days. Relator, who was unemployed and living with his mother, failed to meet this condition and was ordered confined until he had served his entire sentence. A divided court of appeals denied relator's application for writ of habeas corpus without opinion. We granted the writ to release relator on bond pending full consideration of his application. We now order him discharged.

An alleged contemnor has a constitutional right to a jury trial on a "serious" charge of criminal contempt. Ex parte Werblud, 536 S.W.2d 542, 546-47 (Tex. 1976). A charge for which confinement may exceed six months is serious. Id. So is a charge punished by a sentence in excess of 22 years. The record shows that the trial court did not inform relator of his right to a jury trial, and fails to show that Dwight affirmatively waived that right. We will not presume from a silent record that that a contemnor has waived his right to a jury trial. Ex parte Griffin, 682 S.W.2d 261, 262 (Tex. 1984).

Because the trial court's actions conflict with our opinions in Werblud and Griffin, a majority of the court, without hearing oral argument, grants the writ of habeas corpus and orders relator discharged. TEX.R.APP.P. 122.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Sproull

Supreme Court of Texas
Sep 1, 1991
815 S.W.2d 250 (Tex. 1991)

holding in a habeas proceeding that an alleged contemnor, sentenced to twenty-two years' confinement for failure to pay child support, had a constitutional right to a jury trial as he faced a serious charge of criminal contempt; defining a serious charge of criminal contempt as a charge for which the confinement may exceed six months

Summary of this case from Clark v. Bres

In Sproull, 815 S.W.2d at 250, our supreme court specifically held that a charge for which confinement may exceed six months is serious, and the trial court has an obligation to inform the defendant of his right to a jury trial and get an affirmative waiver on the record from the defendant before proceeding without a jury.

Summary of this case from Ex Parte Howell

In Sproull and Griffin the courts held that "in a contempt hearing for a serious offense, waiver of the right to jury trial cannot be presumed from a silent record."

Summary of this case from Ex Parte Mathis

In Sproull the Relator had been held in contempt for failure to pay court ordered child support and sentenced to over twenty-two years in jail — sixty days for each of 136 missed support payments.

Summary of this case from Ex Parte Mathis
Case details for

Ex Parte Sproull

Case Details

Full title:Ex Parte Dwight McDonald SPROULL, Relator

Court:Supreme Court of Texas

Date published: Sep 1, 1991

Citations

815 S.W.2d 250 (Tex. 1991)

Citing Cases

In re Hammond

In her first issue, Hammond argues that she was denied her right to a jury trial. When a contemnor has a…

In re Radmacher

Relator argues, however, that In re Sproull requires a jury trial whenever confinement "may exceed six…