From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex parte Speer

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Oct 26, 2023
WR-59,101-06 (Tex. Crim. App. Oct. 26, 2023)

Opinion

WR-59,101-06

10-26-2023

EX PARTE WILLIAM KEITH SPEER, Applicant


Do Not Publish

ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 99-F-506-005-C IN THE 5TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT BOWIE COUNTY

Keller, P.J., and Yeary, Keel, and Slaughter, JJ., dissented.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

This is a subsequent application for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to the provisions of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 11.071 § 5 and a motion to stay Applicant's execution.

Unless otherwise indicated, all references to Articles in this order refer to the Code of Criminal Procedure.

In October 2001, Applicant was convicted of the offense of capital murder. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 19.03(a). The jury answered the special issues submitted pursuant to Article 37.071, and the trial court, accordingly, set punishment at death. This Court affirmed Applicant's conviction and sentence on direct appeal. Speer v. State, No. AP-74,253 (Tex. Crim. App. Oct. 8, 2003) (not designated for publication). This Court also denied relief on the claims raised in Applicant's initial habeas application and dismissed his subsequent application as an abuse of the writ. Ex parte Speer, No. WR-59,101-01 (Tex. Crim. App. June 20, 2004) (not designated for publication); Ex parte Speer, No. WR-59,101-02 (Tex. Crim. App. Mar. 3, 2010) (not designated for publication). Applicant's instant post-conviction application for a writ of habeas corpus was filed in the trial court on October 18, 2023.

In his application, Applicant alleges that the State violated Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) (Claim 1); the State presented false testimony at the guilt (Claim 2) and punishment (Claim 3) phases of trial; he was denied the effective assistance of counsel at sentencing because his counsel failed to investigate and present mitigating evidence (Claim 4); and, the Attorney General's Office Special Prosecution Unit exceeded its authority in prosecuting Applicant (Claim 5). We have reviewed the application and find that Applicant's execution should be stayed pending further order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 26th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023.


Summaries of

Ex parte Speer

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Oct 26, 2023
WR-59,101-06 (Tex. Crim. App. Oct. 26, 2023)
Case details for

Ex parte Speer

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE WILLIAM KEITH SPEER, Applicant

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Oct 26, 2023

Citations

WR-59,101-06 (Tex. Crim. App. Oct. 26, 2023)