From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Shelby

Supreme Court of Alabama
Apr 10, 1919
81 So. 567 (Ala. 1919)

Opinion

2 Div. 690.

April 10, 1919.

Lavendar Thompson and Jerome T. Fuller, all of Centreville, for appellant.

Ellison Dominick, of Centreville, for appellee.


The Court of Appeals reversed the judgment of the lower court on account of the giving of three charges requested by appellee.

The opinion of the Court of Appeals states that the charges were erroneous because they ignored some of the evidence in the record. Under the rule adopted and pursued by this court in considering certiorari proceedings to the Court of Appeals, we do not review such questions as to what facts are shown by the record; we accept what the Court of Appeals may say as to what facts are or are not shown by the record.

It results that the application for certiorari must be denied.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Shelby

Supreme Court of Alabama
Apr 10, 1919
81 So. 567 (Ala. 1919)
Case details for

Ex Parte Shelby

Case Details

Full title:Ex parte SHELBY

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Apr 10, 1919

Citations

81 So. 567 (Ala. 1919)
202 Ala. 625

Citing Cases

John E. Ballenger Const. Co. v. Joe F. Walters Const

Gen.Acts 1927, p. 357; U.S. Fidelity Guaranty Co. v. First Nat. Bank, 224 Ala. 675, 140 So. 755. The Court of…