From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Schwartz

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Mar 12, 2008
No. WR-69,423-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Mar. 12, 2008)

Opinion

No. WR-69,423-01

Delivered: March 12, 2008. DO NOT PUBLISH.

On Application for A Writ of Habeas Corpus, Cause No. F-9900557-PR in the 265th District Court from Dallas County.


ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex.Crim.App. 1967). After a period of deferred adjudication, Applicant was convicted of aggravated robbery and sentenced to seventy-five years' imprisonment. Applicant's appeal was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Schwartz v. State, No. 05-00-01313-CR (Tex.App.-Dallas, delivered February 12, 2001). Applicant contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to inform Applicant that he could testify at his adjudication and punishment hearing. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 608 (1984); Ex parte Lemke, 13 S.W.3d 791,795-96 (Tex.Crim.App. 2000). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex.Crim.App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall provide Applicant's trial counsel with the opportunity to respond to Applicant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04. The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether the performance of Applicant's trial attorney was deficient and, if so, whether counsel's deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Schwartz

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Mar 12, 2008
No. WR-69,423-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Mar. 12, 2008)
Case details for

Ex Parte Schwartz

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE JUAN ANTONIO SCHWARTZ, Applicant

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Mar 12, 2008

Citations

No. WR-69,423-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Mar. 12, 2008)