From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex parte Samaniego

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Sep 21, 2011
Nos. WR-76,378-01, WR-76,378-02, WR-76,378-03 WR-76,378-04 (Tex. Crim. App. Sep. 21, 2011)

Opinion

NO. WR-76,378-01NO. WR-76,378-02NO. WR-76,378-03NO. WR-76,378-04

09-21-2011

EX PARTE ROBERT FLORES SAMANIEGO, JR., Applicant


ON APPLICATIONS FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. CR-08-075, CR-08-076, CR-08-077 & CR-08-078

IN THE 22ND DISTRICT COURT

FROM HAYS COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of four counts of aggravated assault and sentenced to eighteen years' imprisonment on each count. The Third Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Samaniego v. Texas, Nos. 03-09-00195-CR, 03-09-00196-CR, 03-09-00197-CR & 03-09-00198-CR (Tex. App.-Austin June 10, 2010, pet. ref'd).

Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to object to the admission of extraneous offense evidence. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Exparte Lemke, 13 S.W.3d 791,795-96 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant's claim. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent him at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the performance of trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether his deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

These applications will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: September 21, 2011

Do not publish


Summaries of

Ex parte Samaniego

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Sep 21, 2011
Nos. WR-76,378-01, WR-76,378-02, WR-76,378-03 WR-76,378-04 (Tex. Crim. App. Sep. 21, 2011)
Case details for

Ex parte Samaniego

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE ROBERT FLORES SAMANIEGO, JR., Applicant

Court:COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

Date published: Sep 21, 2011

Citations

Nos. WR-76,378-01, WR-76,378-02, WR-76,378-03 WR-76,378-04 (Tex. Crim. App. Sep. 21, 2011)