From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. State

SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA
May 17, 2019
291 So. 3d 70 (Ala. 2019)

Opinion

1180070

05-17-2019

EX PARTE Demarkus C. ROBINSON (In re: Demarkus C. Robinson v. State of Alabama)

Sammie D. Shaw, Birmingham, for petitioner. Steve Marshall, atty. gen., and Edmund G. LaCour, Jr., deputy atty. gen., and Cecil G. Brendle, Jr., asst. atty. gen., for respondent.


Sammie D. Shaw, Birmingham, for petitioner.

Steve Marshall, atty. gen., and Edmund G. LaCour, Jr., deputy atty. gen., and Cecil G. Brendle, Jr., asst. atty. gen., for respondent.

MENDHEIM, Justice. The writ of certiorari is quashed.

In quashing the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Criminal Appeals' opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So. 2d 155 (1973).

WRIT QUASHED.

Parker, C.J., and Bolin, Shaw, Wise, Bryan, Sellers, Stewart, and Mitchell, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Robinson v. State

SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA
May 17, 2019
291 So. 3d 70 (Ala. 2019)
Case details for

Robinson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Ex parte Demarkus C. Robinson (In re: Demarkus C. Robinson v. State of…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

Date published: May 17, 2019

Citations

291 So. 3d 70 (Ala. 2019)