From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Randolph and Randolph Company

Supreme Court of Alabama
Nov 14, 1997
706 So. 2d 1218 (Ala. 1997)

Opinion

1961550.

November 14, 1997.

Petition for writ for certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals (Bibb Circuit Court, CV-95-18; Court of Civil Appeals, 2951525); Jack W. Meigs, Judge.

Bennett L. Pugh and Sarah J. Carlisle of Carr, Allison, Pugh, Oliver Sisson, P.C., Birmingham, for petitioner.

No brief filed for respondent.


WRIT DENIED.

HOOPER, C.J., and ALMON, HOUSTON, KENNEDY, COOK, and BUTTS, JJ., concur.

MADDOX and SEE, JJ., dissent.


I dissent for the same reasons I dissented in Ex parte Northam, 689 So.2d 854 (Ala. 1996). I do not believe that the testimony of an employee that he or she is disabled is substantial evidence upon which a finding of disability can be made, if there is no medical evidence to support such a finding; therefore, I would issue the writ of certiorari.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Randolph and Randolph Company

Supreme Court of Alabama
Nov 14, 1997
706 So. 2d 1218 (Ala. 1997)
Case details for

Ex Parte Randolph and Randolph Company

Case Details

Full title:Ex parte RANDOLPH AND RANDOLPH COMPANY. (Re RANDOLPH AND RANDOLPH COMPANY…

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Nov 14, 1997

Citations

706 So. 2d 1218 (Ala. 1997)