From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Porter

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Mar 5, 2008
Nos. WR-49,193-06; WR-49,193-07; WR-49,193-08; WR-49,193-09 (Tex. Crim. App. Mar. 5, 2008)

Opinion

Nos. WR-49,193-06; WR-49,193-07; WR-49,193-08; WR-49,193-09

Filed: March 5, 2008. DO NOT PUBLISH

On Applications for writs of Habeas Corpus Cause Nos. 14001; 14002; 14003 and 13794 In The Sixth District Court from Lamar County.


OPINION


Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex.Crim.App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of burglary of a motor vehicle, burglary of a building, and two cases of burglary of a habitation, and sentenced to twenty-five years' imprisonment for each cause. He did not appeal his convictions. Applicant contends that his due process rights were violated in his parole revocation process. Applicant alleges that he informed the parole officer that he was a MHMR patient and was hearing dead people talk to him at the time the officer obtained his signature on the waiver of the right to a parole hearing paperwork. He states that he did not knowingly and voluntarily waive his parole revocation rights. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex.Crim.App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04. The trial court shall make findings as to whether Applicant waived his right to a parole revocation hearing and if so, the circumstances of that waiver. The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether Applicant was a client at MHMR, and if so, if he was on medications. The trial court shall make findings as to what symptoms Applicant exhibited and whether any medication he was on alleviated those symptoms. The trial court shall make findings as to whether Applicant was competent to waive his legal rights if he were displaying the symptoms described when he is denied medication. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Porter

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Mar 5, 2008
Nos. WR-49,193-06; WR-49,193-07; WR-49,193-08; WR-49,193-09 (Tex. Crim. App. Mar. 5, 2008)
Case details for

Ex Parte Porter

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE DAMON DERIC PORTER, Applicant

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Mar 5, 2008

Citations

Nos. WR-49,193-06; WR-49,193-07; WR-49,193-08; WR-49,193-09 (Tex. Crim. App. Mar. 5, 2008)