From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Polly

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
May 6, 2009
No. WR-63,637-03 (Tex. Crim. App. May. 6, 2009)

Opinion

No. WR-63,637-03

Delivered: May 6, 2009. DO NOT PUBLISH

On Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Cause No. 02-5988 in the 106th District Court from Dawson County.


ORDER


Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex.Crim.App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two counts of aggravated assault of a public servant and sentenced to twenty years' imprisonment on each count. The Eleventh Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Polly v. State, No. 11-03-00072-CR (Tex.App.-Eastland, delivered September 9, 2004). Applicant contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by, inter alia, failing to impeach two State's witnesses with their prior inconsistent statements made at disciplinary hearings held regarding these incidents by the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 608 (1984); Ex parte Lemke, 13 S.W.3d 791,795-96 (Tex.Crim.App. 2000). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex.Crim.App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall provide Applicant's trial counsel with the opportunity to respond to Applicant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04. The trial court shall make findings as to whether counsel was aware and in possession of prior inconsistent statements from State's witnesses and if so, whether he used those statements to impeach their trial testimony. The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether the performance of Applicant's trial attorney was deficient and, if so, whether counsel's deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Polly

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
May 6, 2009
No. WR-63,637-03 (Tex. Crim. App. May. 6, 2009)
Case details for

Ex Parte Polly

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE DERRICK ANTHONY POLLY, Applicant

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: May 6, 2009

Citations

No. WR-63,637-03 (Tex. Crim. App. May. 6, 2009)