Opinion
NO. WR-86,250-01
05-17-2017
EX PARTE JOHN CORBAN OGLETREE, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 20,343-A IN THE 258TH DISTRICT COURT FROM POLK COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to two counts of aggravated sexual assault and was sentenced to fifty years' imprisonment on each count. He did not appeal his convictions.
According to the judgment in the record, Applicant pleaded guilty pursuant to a plea bargain for fifty years' imprisonment, but according to Applicant and trial counsel's affidavit, Applicant pleaded guilty without a recommendation. --------
Applicant contends that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to file a motion for a competency evaluation, investigate Applicant's competency, explain the contents of the stipulation and waiver in the plea papers, convey a twenty-year plea offer, and investigate mitigating evidence. Applicant also contends that counsel advised him to plead guilty and to sign the stipulation and waiver because "it was good to do so."
On January 25, 2017, we remanded this application and directed the trial court to order trial counsel to respond to each of Applicant's ineffective assistance of counsel claims. We also directed the trial court to determine whether Applicant's ineffective assistance of counsel claims were barred by the doctrine of laches and whether counsel's conduct was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced.
On February 21, 2017, we received supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, but the trial court signed these on December 29, 2016, before we remanded this application. The supplemental findings and conclusions appear to be based on an affidavit counsel signed on December 16, 2016. This affidavit, however, did not respond to each of Applicant's ineffective assistance of counsel claims. Finally, on February 8, 2017, the trial court appointed counsel to represent Applicant. Based on the record before us, the trial court's December 29 findings and conclusions were erroneously forwarded to this Court.
Accordingly, this application is remanded to the trial court so counsel can respond to each of Applicant's ineffective assistance of counsel claims and the trial court can make further findings and conclusions consistent with this Court's January 25 order.
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court. Filed: May 17, 2017
Do not publish