From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex parte Mendez

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Sep 21, 2022
WR-94,115-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Sep. 21, 2022)

Opinion

WR-94,115-01

09-21-2022

EX PARTE JEFFERY MENDEZ, Applicant


Do not publish

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. D-1-DC-15-301608-A IN THE 403RD DISTRICT COURT FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

ORDER

Per curiam.

Applicant was convicted of capital murder by terror threat and sentenced to life imprisonment. The First Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Mendez v. State, No. 01-18-00067-CR (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] Feb. 21, 2019). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that appellate counsel failed to timely inform Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and advise him of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); Ex parte Crow, 180 S.W.3d 135 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order appellate counsel to respond to Applicant's claim. In developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel's name.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether appellate counsel timely informed Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and that he had a right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review. The trial court shall also determine whether Applicant would have timely filed a petition for discretionary review but for appellate counsel's alleged deficient performance. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant's claim.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court's findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things, affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from hearings and depositions. See Tex. R. App. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested by the trial court and obtained from this Court.


Summaries of

Ex parte Mendez

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Sep 21, 2022
WR-94,115-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Sep. 21, 2022)
Case details for

Ex parte Mendez

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE JEFFERY MENDEZ, Applicant

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Sep 21, 2022

Citations

WR-94,115-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Sep. 21, 2022)