From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex parte McMillan

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jul 31, 2024
WR-80,864-03 (Tex. Crim. App. Jul. 31, 2024)

Opinion

WR-80,864-03

07-31-2024

EX PARTE TERRY RAY MCMILLAN, Applicant


Do not publish

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. W-0550140-B IN THE 265TH DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenced to forty years' imprisonment. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. McMillan v. State, No. 05-14-1419-CR (Tex. App.-Dallas July 1, 2016)(not designated for publication). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel was ineffective because he failed to call an eyewitness to testify and he failed to request a limiting instruction regarding extraneous bad acts. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant's claim. In developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel's name.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel's performance was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether, considering the totality of the circumstances, the common-law doctrine of laches bars equitable relief in this case. Ex parte Perez, 398 S.W.3d 206 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant's claims.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court's findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things, affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from hearings and depositions. See Tex. R. App. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested by the trial court and obtained from this Court.


Summaries of

Ex parte McMillan

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jul 31, 2024
WR-80,864-03 (Tex. Crim. App. Jul. 31, 2024)
Case details for

Ex parte McMillan

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE TERRY RAY MCMILLAN, Applicant

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Jul 31, 2024

Citations

WR-80,864-03 (Tex. Crim. App. Jul. 31, 2024)