From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Mcclure

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Nov 4, 2009
Nos. WR-72,861-01 -02 (Tex. Crim. App. Nov. 4, 2009)

Opinion

Nos. WR-72,861-01 -02

Filed: November 4, 2009. DO NOT PUBLISH.

On Applications for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, Cause Nos. 22196 22195, In The 6th District Court from Lamar County.


ORDER


Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance and delivery of a controlled substance. He was sentenced to imprisonment for twelve and twenty years, respectively. The Sixth Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. McClure v. State, Nos. 06-08-00024-CR 06-08-00025-CR (Tex. App.-Texarkana 2008, no pet.). Applicant contends, among other things, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to investigate the reliability and credibility of the confidential informant and to advise the trial court that the State had agreed to recommend probation. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 608 (1984); Ex parte Lemke, 13 S.W.3d 791,795-96 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall provide Applicant's trial counsel, Heath Hyde, as well as his former trial counsel, Wes Tidwell, with the opportunity to respond to Applicant's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent him at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04. The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether the performance of Applicant's trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel's deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall specifically make findings as to whether the State ever agreed to recommend that Applicant be placed on probation. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief. These applications will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Mcclure

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Nov 4, 2009
Nos. WR-72,861-01 -02 (Tex. Crim. App. Nov. 4, 2009)
Case details for

Ex Parte Mcclure

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE CHARLES TERRELL MCCLURE, Applicant

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Nov 4, 2009

Citations

Nos. WR-72,861-01 -02 (Tex. Crim. App. Nov. 4, 2009)