From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex parte Martin

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Mar 28, 2018
NO. WR-88,143-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Mar. 28, 2018)

Opinion

NO. WR-88,143-01

03-28-2018

EX PARTE KENYA ABDULE MARTIN, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. W-69825-01-A IN THE 47TH DISTRICT COURT FROM POTTER COUNTY

Per curiam. Alcala , J., filed a concurring opinion. ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of capital murder, and he was sentenced to life in prison. The Seventh Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction in an unpublished opinion. Martin v. State, No. 07-15-00079-CR (Tex. App.—Amarillo May 15, 2017).

Applicant raises several claims in his habeas application, including claims of ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel. He has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). There is no response from trial or appellate counsel in the record provided to this Court, and there are no findings from the trial court. In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact.

The trial court shall order trial and appellate counsel to respond to Applicant's claims of ineffective assistance by explaining counsels' representation of Applicant, including applicable strategy and tactical decisions. To obtain the responses, the trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding the claims raised in the habeas application. The trial court may also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claims for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court. Filed: March 28, 2018
Do not publish


Summaries of

Ex parte Martin

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Mar 28, 2018
NO. WR-88,143-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Mar. 28, 2018)
Case details for

Ex parte Martin

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE KENYA ABDULE MARTIN, Applicant

Court:COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

Date published: Mar 28, 2018

Citations

NO. WR-88,143-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Mar. 28, 2018)