From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Lundy

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jun 30, 1920
85 So. 821 (Ala. 1920)

Opinion

4 Div. 892.

June 30, 1920.

E. O. Baldwin, of Andalusia, for petitioner.

J. Q. Smith, Atty. Gen., for the State.


The questions argued in the brief in support of the application for certiorari were correctly decided by the Court of Appeals. 85 So. 819. The reference in the opinion of the Court of Appeals to the photograph of the deceased might be interpreted as casting doubt upon the correctness of the action of the trial court in admitting that photograph in evidence. The photo was properly received in evidence. Sanders v. State, 202 Ala. 37, 79 So. 375, 376.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Lundy

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jun 30, 1920
85 So. 821 (Ala. 1920)
Case details for

Ex Parte Lundy

Case Details

Full title:Ex parte LUNDY. LUNDY v. STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Jun 30, 1920

Citations

85 So. 821 (Ala. 1920)
204 Ala. 492

Citing Cases

Hicks v. State

We can conceive of no reason why the exhibit was not admissible. Appellant cites no authority to sustain his…

Hawkins v. State

We can conceive of no reason why the exhibit was not admissible. Appellant cites no authority to sustain his…