From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex parte Love

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Aug 21, 2013
(Tex. Crim. App. Aug. 21, 2013)

Opinion

08-21-2013

EX PARTE LEO ALLEN LOVE, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. W-1159295-Y IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 7

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam .

ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to aggravated sexual assault of a child, and was sentenced to fifteen years' imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends, inter alia, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel failed to consult with him, failed to investigate his mental capabilities, failed to explain Applicant's rights or the consequences of his plea, and only sought a plea agreement.

This Court has considered Applicant's other grounds for review, and finds them to be without merit.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Specifically, counsel shall state how often he met with Applicant or consulted with Applicant about the case. Counsel shall state what kind of investigation, if any, was performed in this case. Counsel shall state whether he saw evidence that Applicant lacked understanding of the proceedings, or that he was not competent to enter a plea. Counsel shall state whether he explained the nature and consequences of the plea to Applicant. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the performance of Applicant's trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel's deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court. Do not publish


Summaries of

Ex parte Love

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Aug 21, 2013
(Tex. Crim. App. Aug. 21, 2013)
Case details for

Ex parte Love

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE LEO ALLEN LOVE, Applicant

Court:COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

Date published: Aug 21, 2013

Citations

(Tex. Crim. App. Aug. 21, 2013)