From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Lister

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Dec 15, 2010
No. WR-74,868-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Dec. 15, 2010)

Opinion

No. WR-74,868-01

Filed: December 15, 2010. DO NOT PUBLISH.

On Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Cause No. C-34,391, appeal from the 244th District Court, Ector County.


ORDER


Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was indicted for burglary of a habitation. He pleaded guilty and was convicted of theft. He later pleaded true to a motion to revoke community supervision and was sentenced to two years' imprisonment in a state jail facility. The Eleventh Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Lister v. State, No. 11-09-00251-CR (Tex. App.-Eastland Jan. 7, 2010) (unpublished). Applicant raises several grounds of review. He contends, inter alia, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel did not investigate the facts of the case and allowed applicant to plead guilty to a state jail felony when the actual value of stolen goods was insufficient to support a state jail felony charge. The habeas record contains no response from the State and no findings and conclusions from the trial judge. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 608 (1984); Ex parte Lemke, 13 S.W.3d 791,795-96 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order Applicant's trial counsel to respond to Applicant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether the performance of Applicant's trial attorney was deficient and, if so, whether counsel's deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with any court documents relating to any plea agreements and the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Lister

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Dec 15, 2010
No. WR-74,868-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Dec. 15, 2010)
Case details for

Ex Parte Lister

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE LANCE ALAN LISTER, Applicant

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Dec 15, 2010

Citations

No. WR-74,868-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Dec. 15, 2010)