From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Lindway

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 2, 1937
9 N.E.2d 1 (Ohio 1937)

Opinion

No. 26569

Decided June 2, 1937.

Habeas corpus — Writ not available to review criminal proceedings, when.

IN HABEAS CORPUS.

Mr. W.H. Wolf, for petitioner.


Petitioner was indicted by a grand jury, tried and convicted by a jury and sentenced to the penitentiary by the Court of Common Pleas. He prosecuted error to the Court of Appeals, which reversed the judgment of Common Pleas Court, and this court reversed the judgment of the Court of Appeals and affirmed the judgment of Common Pleas Court. State v. Lindway, 131 Ohio St. 166, 2 N.E.2d 490.

Petitioner prays that a writ of habeas corpus be issued and directed to the warden of the penitentiary.

Habeas corpus is not the proper mode of redress where the petitioner has been convicted of a criminal offense, sentenced to imprisonment by a court of competent jurisdiction, and errors or irregularities occurring in the proceedings or sentence have been reviewed by proceedings in error. ( Ex parte Van Hagan, 25 Ohio St. 426.)

Petition dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., JONES, MATTHIAS, DAY, ZIMMERMAN, WILLIAMS and MYERS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Lindway

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 2, 1937
9 N.E.2d 1 (Ohio 1937)
Case details for

Ex Parte Lindway

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE LINDWAY

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jun 2, 1937

Citations

9 N.E.2d 1 (Ohio 1937)
9 N.E.2d 1

Citing Cases

In re Schanck

The trial court properly charged the jury in regard to the application of the provisions of Section 12380,…