From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Lewis

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Sep 12, 2007
No. WR-66,190-02 (Tex. Crim. App. Sep. 12, 2007)

Opinion

No. WR-66,190-02

Filed: September 12, 2007. DO NOT PUBLISH.

On Application for A Writ of Habeas Corpus Cause No. 63181 In the 252nd District Court from Jefferson County.


ORDER


Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex.Crim.App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle and sentenced to ten years' imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction. Applicant contends that after he was released on mandatory supervision, Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Parole Division held a revocation hearing and voted to send him to an Intermediate Sanction Facility (ISF). But shortly thereafter, he contends, the Parole Division revoked his mandatory supervision without holding a hearing. On January 10, 2007, we remanded this application and instructed the trial court to obtain an affidavit from the Parole Division. The Parole Division, however, did not submit an affidavit. We believe that the record is not sufficient to resolve Applicant's claim. In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex.Crim.App. 1997), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. Accordingly, the trial court shall order the Parole Division to submit an affidavit in response to Applicant's claim. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent him at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04. The trial court shall then make findings of fact as to whether the Parole Division held a revocation hearing after Applicant was sent to an ISF. Ex parte Catham, 59 S.W.3d 677 (Tex.Crim.App. 2001). The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Lewis

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Sep 12, 2007
No. WR-66,190-02 (Tex. Crim. App. Sep. 12, 2007)
Case details for

Ex Parte Lewis

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE ANDREW JOSEPH LEWIS, Applicant

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Sep 12, 2007

Citations

No. WR-66,190-02 (Tex. Crim. App. Sep. 12, 2007)