From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex parte Kuon

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Jun 7, 2017
NO. WR-86,775-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Jun. 7, 2017)

Opinion

NO. WR-86,775-01

06-07-2017

EX PARTE BILLY SARAK KUON, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 1518490-A IN THE 263rd DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam. KEASLER, J., not participating. ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of assault of a family member and sentenced to two years' imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends, inter alia, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because a family member, who was an eyewitness, gave counsel an affidavit stating Applicant acted in self-defense. Applicant alleges counsel erroneously advised him to plead guilty knowing he was innocent and acting in self-defense.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the performance of Applicant's trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel's deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court. Filed: June 7, 2017
Do not publish


Summaries of

Ex parte Kuon

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Jun 7, 2017
NO. WR-86,775-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Jun. 7, 2017)
Case details for

Ex parte Kuon

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE BILLY SARAK KUON, Applicant

Court:COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

Date published: Jun 7, 2017

Citations

NO. WR-86,775-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Jun. 7, 2017)