From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Jordan

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Feb 14, 1973
490 S.W.2d 585 (Tex. Crim. App. 1973)

Opinion

No. 46460.

February 14, 1973.

Houston Thompson, Silsbee, for appellant.

Robert S. Coe, Dist. Atty., Kountze, Jim D. Vollers, State's Atty., and Robert A. Huttash, Asst. State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


OPINION


This is a habeas corpus proceeding under Article 11.07, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P. The petitioner is confined in the Texas Department of Corrections under sentence in Cause No. 6710 of the District Court of the 88th Judicial District of Hardin County, on May 28, 1971, ordering his confinement for 20 years for the offense of statutory rape.

The petitioner argues that he was not properly admonished according to Article 26.13, V.A.C.C.P., when he entered a plea of guilty before the court. Both the trial judge and the State concede error.

This provision of the statute is mandatory. Crocker v. State, and cases cited therein, 485 S.W.2d 566 (Tex.Cr.App. 1972).

The petitioner has not served the maximum punishment which could be imposed for the offense of statutory rape; therefore, he is not entitled to be discharged from confinement. Ex parte Reno, 477 S.W.2d 292 (Tex.Cr.App. 1972).

Petitioner is ordered released from confinement by the Department of Corrections and ordered delivered to the sheriff of Hardin County there to answer the indictment pending against him.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Jordan

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Feb 14, 1973
490 S.W.2d 585 (Tex. Crim. App. 1973)
Case details for

Ex Parte Jordan

Case Details

Full title:Ex parte Hicks JORDAN

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Feb 14, 1973

Citations

490 S.W.2d 585 (Tex. Crim. App. 1973)

Citing Cases

Williams v. State

This Court has not heretofore applied these two basic rules to interpreting Article 26.13, supra, and has…

Thornton v. State

Article 26.13, V.A.C.C.P., and its federal counterpart, Rule 11, F.R.Crim.P., were intended and are…