From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Johnson

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Aug 25, 2010
No. WR-67,825-02 (Tex. Crim. App. Aug. 25, 2010)

Opinion

No. WR-67,825-02

Filed: August 25, 2010. DO NOT PUBLISH.

On Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Cause No. 18,819 in the 258th District Court from Polk County.


ORDER


Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of engaging in organized criminal activity and sentenced to thirty-five years' imprisonment. The Ninth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. 09-07-00504-CR (Tex. App.-Beaumont, delivered December 17, 2008). Applicant contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to file a motion to suppress based on an illegal search of Applicant's vehicle, failed to file a motion to suppress the pre-trial and in-court identifications of Applicant, and failed to object to hearsay testimony which violated Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004). Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 608 (1984); Ex parte Lemke, 13 S.W.3d 791,795-96 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order Applicant's trial counsel to submit an affidavit responding to Applicant's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. In addition, the trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether the performance of Applicant's trial attorney was deficient and, if so, whether counsel's deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Johnson

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Aug 25, 2010
No. WR-67,825-02 (Tex. Crim. App. Aug. 25, 2010)
Case details for

Ex Parte Johnson

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE JOE ISAAC JOHNSON, Applicant

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Aug 25, 2010

Citations

No. WR-67,825-02 (Tex. Crim. App. Aug. 25, 2010)