From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Ingram

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 5, 1966
185 So. 2d 149 (Ala. Crim. App. 1966)

Opinion

3 Div. 213.

April 5, 1966.

Petition for habeas corpus.

Troy Ingram, pro se.

Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., and David W. Clark, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


The writ of habeas corpus is not the proper mode of presenting the questions incident to lack of counsel on arraignment.

Hence, the purported appeal from the Montgomery Circuit Court seeks review of a futile judicial labor.

The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution in the Circuit Court.

Dismissed.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Ingram

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 5, 1966
185 So. 2d 149 (Ala. Crim. App. 1966)
Case details for

Ex Parte Ingram

Case Details

Full title:Ex parte Troy INGRAM

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Apr 5, 1966

Citations

185 So. 2d 149 (Ala. Crim. App. 1966)
43 Ala. App. 709