From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

EX PARTE HAAS

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jun 8, 2011
No. WR-75,757-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Jun. 8, 2011)

Opinion

No. WR-75,757-01

Delivered: June 8, 2011. DO NOT PUBLISH.

On Application for A Writ of Habeas Corpus Cause No. 16176-B In the 104th Judicial District Court from Taylor County.


ORDER


Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant entered an open plea of guilty to indecency with a child, and was sentenced to eight years' imprisonment. Applicant contends, inter alia, that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel mis-advised him regarding his right to appeal. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 608 (1984); Ex parte Lemke, 13 S.W.3d 791,795-96 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall provide counsel with the opportunity to respond to Applicant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04. The trial court shall first supplement the habeas record with copies of any plea papers in this case, and with a transcript of the plea and punishment hearings. The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether Applicant was correctly advised of his right to appeal, and if so, whether he indicated any desire to appeal. If Applicant did indicate that he wanted to appeal, the trial court shall make findings as to whether appellate counsel was appointed, and if not, why not. The trial court shall make findings as to whether Applicant was denied his right to a meaningful appeal because of erroneous advice regarding his right to appeal. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.


Summaries of

EX PARTE HAAS

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jun 8, 2011
No. WR-75,757-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Jun. 8, 2011)
Case details for

EX PARTE HAAS

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE ROBERT LEN HAAS, Applicant

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Jun 8, 2011

Citations

No. WR-75,757-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Jun. 8, 2011)

Citing Cases

Ex parte Medina

Our official form, required to be used in all non-death-penalty applications for a writ of habeas corpus,…