From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

EX PARTE GUIN

Supreme Court of Alabama
Nov 12, 1925
106 So. 67 (Ala. 1925)

Opinion

6 Div. 499.

October 15, 1925. Rehearing Denied November 12, 1925.

William J. Foster and William M. Adams, both of Tuscaloosa, for petitioner.

S. H. Sprott, of Tuscaloosa, opposed.


Petition of Murry Guin for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in the case of Guin v. City of Tuscaloosa, 106 So. 64.

Without committing ourselves to all that is said in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, we concur in the conclusion there reached, and consequently the writ will be denied.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE, GARDNER, and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

EX PARTE GUIN

Supreme Court of Alabama
Nov 12, 1925
106 So. 67 (Ala. 1925)
Case details for

EX PARTE GUIN

Case Details

Full title:Ex parte Murry GUIN (GUIN v. CITY OF TUSCALOOSA)

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Nov 12, 1925

Citations

106 So. 67 (Ala. 1925)
213 Ala. 685

Citing Cases

Walton v. City of Tuscaloosa

SAMFORD, J. Affirmed on authority of Guin v. City of Tuscaloosa, ante, p. 61. 106 So. 64; Ex parte Guin, 213…

Harris v. City of Tuscaloosa

The circuit judge does have authority to impose additional sentence to hard labor, and impose sentence to pay…