From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Garza

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Apr 25, 2007
No. WR-67,317-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Apr. 25, 2007)

Opinion

No. WR-67,317-01

Filed: April 25, 2007. DO NOT PUBLISH

On Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Cause No. CR-0336-03-C(1) in the 139th Judicial District Court from Hidalgo County.


ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex.Crim.App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to delivery of a controlled substance and was sentenced to seven years' imprisonment. Applicant contends that he was denied adequate notice that he would be considered for release on mandatory supervision by the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles under the discretionary mandatory-supervision statute, Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 42.18, § 8(c). Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex.Crim.App. 1997), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04. The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether Applicant was afforded adequate notice that he would be considered for release on mandatory supervision by the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles under the discretionary mandatory-supervision statute. Ex parte Retzlaff, 135 S.W.3d 45 (Tex.Crim.App. 2004). The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Garza

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Apr 25, 2007
No. WR-67,317-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Apr. 25, 2007)
Case details for

Ex Parte Garza

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE REYNALDO GARZA, JR., Applicant

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Apr 25, 2007

Citations

No. WR-67,317-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Apr. 25, 2007)