Ex Parte Estes

1 Citing case

  1. Rheaume v. State

    624 So. 2d 678 (Ala. Crim. App. 1993)   Cited 4 times

    It is not necessary that the indictment state the name of the ultimate owner of the property; ownership, for purposes of an indictment, is correctly placed in the bailee or the party in lawful possession of the property that is stolen. Estes v. State, 365 So.2d 1259, 1262 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978), writ denied, 365 So.2d 1262 (Ala. 1979). See also Belue v. State, 362 So.2d 1330 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978).